Norwin School District considers feasibility of science and technology building
Norwin officials will decide this summer if the district will embark upon a fundraising campaign to cover the cost of a science and technology building.
The proposed STEM Center would enable high school students to explore career pathways and work with Norwin teachers and mentors from business and industry teaching high tech in demand skills.
Bob Carter Companies, a firm that specializes in fundraising for nonprofit organizations, has interviewed 32 community leaders about the proposed STEM Center and the ability of the district to pay for the construction of the center. Jeff Curry, managing director of the firm, said the leaders interviewed had a “favorable impression” of the school district.
Now, the school board will have to decide if that good will lead to a capital campaign.
Superintendent William Kerr said the board will decide whether to move forward with the capital campaign over the next 60 to 90 days. Fundraising and philanthropy are new revenue sources for public education, Curry said. Kerr said this type of campaign is “a new concept for K-12.”
Next steps for the campaign would include creating a formal plan to select leadership for a steering committee and establishing a final plan for the campaign. The Bob Carter Companies would help to seek support from established foundations while the committee would reach out to the community.
Public funding of the facility is “the lowest-cost funding available because it doesn't have to be paid back,” Kerr said.
Bob Carter Companies is an international fundraising and philanthropy counsel and was hired by the district in February to determine if the district has the support to fund the building of the STEM center through fundraising.
Dave Rullo is a freelance writer for Trib Total Media.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.