PH Council eyes $28.8M budget, no tax increase
Penn Hills residents will see a reduction in their millage rate in 2013, but it likely will not result in a lower tax bill.
Penn Hills Municipal Council held a public hearing on the 2013 budget prior to its Dec. 3 meeting.
The proposed millage rate for the coming year is 5.444 mills, about 0.16 mills lower than 2012.
But the rate change is due to uncertainty over reassessment values, which will not be finalized until after the new year.
Senior Common Pleas Judge R. Stanton Wettick indicated that he might grant Allegheny County municipalities and school districts an extension for approving their budgets.
The extension gives county officials more time to provide the most accurate reassessment data, which in turn allows local governments and school districts to set proper property tax rates and approve their 2013 budgets by the state-mandated deadline of Dec. 31.
If Wettick grants the extension, that deadline would shift to Jan. 7.
Council's final vote on the 2013 budget will take place at a Dec. 31 special council meeting.
Penn Hills Municipal Manager Moe Rayan said the millage decrease in the 2013 budget is in anticipation of a roughly 8-percent increase in overall property values.
State law requires an adjustment of millage rates so that new reassessment data does not provide a financial windfall for local governments.
“(The new millage rate) is an approximation,” Rayan said, adding that mayor and council “have the ability to reopen the 2013 budget to make any necessary adjustments” after the final reassessment numbers are in.
In his budget projections, Rayan estimated that the new millage rate will result in one mill generating about $1.44 million, roughly $100,000 more than in 2012, when one mill generated just less than $1.34 million.
The $28.8-million budget Rayan proposed to council is a 7.8-percent increase over the 2012 budget.
Revenues are projected to be higher than in 2012 by $576,000, and expenditures are projected to increase by a little more than $2 million.
One item which will not be included in the final budget is revenue generated from the proposed Walmart on Saltsburg Road.
Penn Hills planners confirmed in November that Walmart had pulled out of the project, opting instead to build a store in Wilkins Township off Route 22 where Sears is currently located.
Deputy Mayor Sara Kuhn wanted to know if Walmart's decision — as well as revenue from the projected sale of the former public-works garage on Frankstown Road — would affect the end balance of the budget, which Rayan said will be about $867,000.
“I don't like projected money that you can't necessarily count on,” Kuhn said.
Walmart and the sale of the garage would combine for about $400,000 in revenue.
Rayan said that through small budget cuts — equipment purchases and other comparatively minor expenditures — the end balance would not be affected.
The budget includes contractual raises of 3.25 percent for police and public-works employees, and 3 percent for emergency medical services workers, members of the Municipal Employees Organization and all non-union employees, management and non-management.
The municipality will have about $457,000 available for capital improvements in 2013, an increase of roughly $51,000 over last year.
Mayor DeLuca said the 2013 proposed budget “gives every department a little bit of what they need. It's unfortunate that the county reassessment numbers will not be in in time, but I have to commend the staff and manager for presenting a detailed, balanced budget.”
The final budget hearing is slated to take place Dec. 28, with the budget vote to follow.
Patrick Varine is an editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7845 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.