PHSD part of state's pilot process for comprehensive planning
The Penn Hills School District is a Phase I pilot district for the state's new comprehensive planning process. This three-year Comprehensive Plan replaces the six-year Strategic Plan previously required by Chapter 4 of the Pennsylvania School Code.
This new comprehensive plan will be utilized by staff and administration as a living document for guiding and focusing efforts to make the Penn Hills School District a “place of realized potential” for the entire school community. The district-level team used the answers to 13 guiding questions to identify accomplishments and systemic challenges. Three of the district's buildings (the high school, Linton, and Penn Hebron) were involved in writing school improvement plans. Those plans were then incorporated into the district's Comprehensive Plan.
As part of the Comprehensive Planning Process, a draft of the Penn Hills School District Plan will be available for public review and an opportunity to submit suggestions or questions. The finalized Plan will be recommended to the School Board for adoption at the meeting on Jan. 14, 2013.
Copies of the plan and feedback forms are available in the office of all district buildings, and can also be found online at www.PHSD.k12.pa.us. Comments will be accepted until Dec. 30.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.