Police arrest fugitive on sheriff's 'most wanted firearms' list
Members of the Allegheny County Fugitive Squad and Wilkinsburg police arrested a man listed on the county sheriff's Most Wanted Firearms Fugitives list, according to a news release from the sheriff's office.
Troy Jackson, 45, has been sought by law enforcement since skipping a court hearing Jan. 11. The news release from the sheriff's office lists Jackson as a Penn Hills resident, although older court cases alternately list Jackson as a resident of Pittsburgh, West Mifflin and Monroeville.
Jackson initially was arrested in July 2011 when Monroeville police responded to a report of a man outside of a Monroeville Boulevard bar with a shotgun. The man is alleged to have pointed the shotgun at a witness saying, “Nothing to see,” and then entered a red car with a female inside.
Monroeville police placed Jackson in custody a short time later, recovering a shotgun during the arrest.
After a lengthy investigation, members of the sheriff's fugitive squad and Wilkinsburg police located Jackson at a residence on the 500 block of Franklin Avenue in Wilkinsburg, where he was arrested Dec. 17 after being found in a third-floor bathroom.
He was taken to the Allegheny County Jail and will be held without bond on charges of possession of a firearm by person prohibited, simple assault, recklessly endangering another person and terroristic threats with intent to terrorize another.
The sheriff's Most Wanted Firearms Fugitives list is available by visiting www.sheriffalleghenycounty.com/vufa_most_wanted.html.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Penn State mens basketball wins fourth in a row, improves to 6-1
- Disney TV Animation going strong after 30 years
- Gazing at the grass in winter is a vision in grace
- Fayette County history could fetch big bucks at Ohio auction
- Homework: Gifts and Greens Market is Dec. 4-6
- National Portrait Gallery asks public to vote for art
- Homes for the holiday: Christmas house tours abound
- Photo of suspect in Greendale Tavern burglary/fire released
- Steelers notebook: Defense has a retro feel
- Stakes high as ex-Saints receiver Moore faces his former team
- No decision yet on charges against elderly driver who struck and killed pregnant woman