Share This Page

Point Breeze man sentenced to 5-10 years in fatal Milltown Road crash

| Friday, Jan. 4, 2013, 12:20 p.m.
PENN HILLS PROGRESS
Duane C. Woodson, 50, of Point Breeze, pleaded guilty to vehicular homicide in connection with a head-on collision in Penn Hills that killed a woman and seriously injured her 9-year-old son. FILE PHOTO

A Point Breeze man has been sentenced to between five and 10 years in prison after pleading guilty to charges of vehicular homicide, in a May 2012 crash in Penn Hills that killed a woman and critically injured her 9-year-old son.

Christine Beilstein, 45, of Plum died shortly after the accident, according to the Allegheny County Medical Examiner's office. Her son, whom police did not identify, was flown to a local hospital with severe head injuries in critical condition.

Police said Duane C. Woodson, 50, was driving a tow truck in the 1000 block of Milltown Road and crossed into opposing traffic, colliding head-on with Beilstein's vehicle.

Woodson, who was not licensed, attempted to flee the accident scene on foot, but was caught, police said.

Woodson pleaded guilty to homicide by vehicle while driving under the influence, aggravated assault by vehicle while driving under the influence and other related charges. He was sentenced by Judge Philip Ignelzi.

Court records show Woodson's blood-alcohol content at the time of the crash was between 0.10 and 0.16, which triggered an additional charge of driving under the influence with a high blood-alcohol rate.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.