Penn Hills library's chess tournament set for this month
Luke Weiland, 9, of Mars won his first chess tournament at the age of 7.
Last year, he took second place in the junior division at the Penn Hills library's chess tournament, and he's gearing up for this year's competition, which will take place Feb. 16 at the library on Stotler Road.
“I think it's wonderful,” said Luke's mother, Leslie, who taught him to play chess when he was 4. “I played as a kid, and I thought he would like it.”
Weiland said he has a lot of fun playing chess but can't explain why he enjoys the game so much. He said his favorite chess piece is the knight.
“He's different from the other pieces,” Weiland said. “He moves different and looks different.”
Weiland is also looking to step up his chess game: he now takes chess lessons from Phillip Ochman, who is based in Israel and teaches lessons online. The Weilands found Ochman through the Chess.com website.
Leslie Weiland said the game is a good way to challenge kids.
“Luke is very bright, but he didn't always do things that were too hard for him before, and I think (chess) has made him mature a little bit and look for bigger challenges in school.
“It also teaches you how to lose, because he'll never win all the games,” she said.
The William E. Anderson Library's chess tournament will take place from 9:15 to 11:30 a.m. Feb. 16. There are two divisions: junior (kindergarten through fourth grade) and senior (fifth through eighth grades). Anyone interested in participating must register in advance by calling 412-795-3507, ext. 115.
Patrick Varine is an editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7845 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.