ShareThis Page

Lady Indians end three-year WPIAL playoff drought

| Friday, Feb. 22, 2013, 11:29 a.m.
Penn Hills Progress
Jade Ely looks to make a move during the Lady Indians' playoff loss to Norwin on Friday, Feb. 15, 2013. Aaron Loughner | For The Penn Hills Progress
Aaron Loughner | For the Penn Hills Progress
Coach John Tate speaks with his team prior to their playoff game against Norwin on Friday, Feb, 15, 2013, at Gateway High. Tate's team went on a late run in 2013 to make the playoffs for the first time in four years.
Penn Hills Progress
Senior Gloria Schifino is the Lady Indians' leading scorer this season. Aaron Loughner | For The Penn Hills Progress
Penn Hills Progress
Jade Reese comes down with the ball during Penn Hills' playoff game, Friday, Feb. 15, 2013, at Gateway High School. Aaron Loughner | For The Penn Hills Progress
Penn Hills Progress
Jade Reese releases a shot at the Lady Indians' Friday, Feb. 15, 2013, playoff game against Norwin. Aaron Loughner | For The Penn Hills Progress
Penn Hills Progress
The Lady Indians made the playoffs for the first time in four years, but lost their first-round game, 68-56. Aaron Loughner | For The Penn Hills Progress
Penn Hills Progress
Gloria Schifino drives hard to the hoop on Friday, Feb. 15, 2013. Aaron Loughner | For The Penn Hills Progress

The Penn Hills Lady Indians might have lost their first-round playoff game to Norwin, but for coach John Tate, it's hardly a reason to hang their heads.

Norwin put its height to good use and broke the Lady Indians' pressure defense, as 14th-seeded Norwin advanced with a 68-56 win over Penn Hills at Gateway High School in their WPIAL Class AAAA playoff game Feb. 15.

Tate, in his first year as head coach, said he's satisfied with his team's turnaround this year, which saw the Lady Indians end a three-year playoff drought.

“We looked back at it overall, and for the most part, we're happy,” Tate said.

“There were some games we thought we should have won that we didn't, but we didn't lose to one team that didn't make the playoffs.”

Jade Ely led all scorers with 26 points for Penn Hills (9-14), and Gloria Schifino had 11 points and six assists for the Indians, who reached the playoffs as a fourth-place team by going 7-3 over their final 10 regular-season games.

Penn Hills caused some early troubles for Norwin with its full-court press, and Ely had a big first quarter with eight points in the opening five minutes.

The Indians led, 12-10, but that was their final advantage of the game.

By halftime, the Knights had a 44-23 lead, but Penn Hills put up more resistance in the second half.

The Indians put together a 10-4 run of their own and ended the third quarter with two baskets in the final minute to close the lead to 52-41.

But Norwin answered with an inside basket by Rachel DelleFemine and a 3-pointer by Gribble to start the final quarter and effectively put the game out of reach.

While the playoff loss was a disappointment, Tate was focused on the positives strides his team made throughout the season.

“We won more games this year than the last two seasons combined, and we're very proud of that,” he said.

“I think we've turned the page on Penn Hills girls basketball not being taken seriously. We're very confident that we've turned that corner.”

The squad will lose two senior starters: leading scorer Gloria Schifino and Ryan Glaze, who Tate said is the team's best post player.

“It's a credit to those young ladies that they'll be hard to replace,” Tate said.

“They spent three years playing with a totally different philosophy, and I think a lot of our success can be credited to those two ladies buying in and helping to lead our underclassmen.”

Matt Grubba is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-388-5830 or Trib Total Media Editor Patrick Varine contributed to this story.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.