PHSD works to address $5M deficit in budget
A Penn Hills School District budget with a $925,000 deficit is the best-case scenario that district business director Richard Liberto said he could present to the school board finance committee.
Liberto spoke to the committee April 15, laying out several budget options for the 2013-14 year that utilize combinations of staff cuts and restructuring the district's 2009 debt.
All of the scenarios call for $81 million in expenditures for the year, and figure in revenue of $75.7 million — for a $5.3 million deficit.
Restructuring the 2009 debt would be a one-year fix and would alleviate $2.3 million to $4 million of the deficit, Liberto said.
Two of the four budget options he recommended include staff reductions that would cut an additional $2.1 million from the deficit.
Liberto said that dollar figure doesn't represent a specific number of positions, “just the number needed to make the budget work.”
Liberto also bemoaned the silence from state officials about education funding.
“There's so much unknown,” he said.
“We haven't heard anything since February at the state level.”
The budgets Liberto recommended are projected to play out as follows:
• Staff reductions only — projected $3.2 million deficit.
• Debt restructuring only — projected $3 million deficit.
• Combination of both — projected $925,000 deficit.
Liberto referred to the combination option as “the most realistic budget.”
He also requested that the district move its May school board meeting — at which the board would vote on a preliminary 2013-14 budget — from May 13 to May 30 in order to have the maximum amount of time to rework budget numbers based on new information regarding state funding.
No action was taken on this.
The district must adopt a budget by June 30.
Patrick Varine is an editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7845 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.