Judge dismisses PFA on Linton Middle School principal
An Allegheny County judge dismissed a temporary protection from abuse order against a Penn Hills School District principal, county court officials confirmed on Wednesday.
Linton Middle School Principal Davaun Barnett was placed on leave last week from the Penn Hills School District after Barnett's wife filed a request for a protection from abuse order against him. Barnett's wife, Lisa, a law professor at Duquesne University, filed for the order May 7 with the Allegheny County Common Pleas Court's Family Division.
Barnett's attorney, Francis Wymard of the Pittsburgh firm Burns White, sent a letter to the district on May 16 stating that the PFA had been dismissed.
“Mr. Barnett continues to strictly deny all allegations contained within the petition,” Wymard wrote in the May 16 letter.
No charges have been filed against Barnett, 41, according to county court records, and court officials said their involvement in the matter is over. Barnett on Tuesday provided a copy of the letter that his attorney forwarded to the school district; he did not comment further.
Lisa Barnett's petition also alleges that Barnett came to his wife's Duquesne University law class and had to be escorted from the building by campus police. The university's public affairs office last week confirmed that Barnett is barred from the Downtown campus.
Barnett has “taken a leave of absence for the remainder of the school year,” according to a May 14 letter sent to Linton parents. Penn Hills School District spokeswoman Teresita Kolenchak said the district is not commenting on the situation.
Barnett has served as principal at Linton Middle School since 2011.
Patrick Varine is an editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7845 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.