Penn Hills school board will take final budget vote on June 27
A vote on the Penn Hills School District's final 2013-14 budget will take place June 27, at a 7 p.m. meeting at Linton Middle School.
Concrete budget numbers are still up in the air after a proposal to furlough teachers resulted in a 4-4 tie vote at the school board's May 30 meeting. Board member Donald Kuhn was not present.
The furloughs represented a significant portion of the cuts used to balance next year's budget. District officials made cuts to bring down what was originally a $5 million deficit.
At the school board finance committee's Monday-night meeting, business director Richard Liberto said the only way to make up the cost of the furloughs — about $1.7 million — would be to restructure more of the district's debt service. Liberto's original proposal was to push about $2.3 million forward to future payments. If the teacher furloughs do not pass, he said that number would need to be around $4 million.
Finance committee chairman and school board member Joe Bailey said the teacher furloughs will be back on the agenda at the June 27 meeting, which will take place at the middle school, located at 250 Aster Street.
Patrick Varine is an editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7845 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.