Senior PGA golfers volunteer at Verona Habitat project
Margaret Rumley wants to do her own landscaping, but there's a problem.
“If it's just me, it takes about a month to do it all,” said Rumley, 87, a native of Latrobe who has lived in her Sisto Street home in Verona for 25 years.
“Once I'm done, it's time to start again,” she said.
Through a partnership between Habitat for Humanity, Constellation Energy and the Professional Golfers' Association, Rumley had a backyard of volunteers — including three members of the PGA Senior Tour — lending a helping hand with the yard work on June 25.
Professional golfers Joe Daley, Sandy Lyle and Peter Senior were helping a crew of about 20 volunteers with landscaping. Rumley said Habitat officials last week fixed her roof, which was leaking water into her bedroom.
Senior, of Queensland in Australia, said he is happy to help.
“Most towns where we play, we have charities that we normally work with, hospital visits, personal appearances and so forth,” he said, adding that this is the first time he's worked with Habitat for Humanity.
“We wanted to spend a little bit of time helping out,” he said.
PGA Director of Communications Mark Williams said PGA officials and golfers have been doing this type of charity work since 1938.
“Last year, we raised about $130 million for charity benefits all over the world,” Williams said. “We're closing in on $2 billion in charitable donations.”
Senior, Lyle and Daley played in the Constellation Senior Player Championship June 27 to June 30 at Fox Chapel Golf Club, where Daley was the defending champion.
They were headed next to Omaha, Neb., for the U.S. Senior Open Championship.
Rumley made her feelings known about the work being done.
“It's great,” she said.
Patrick Varine is an editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7845 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.