Rezoning appeal cancelled for Maple Lane property
The appeal of Penn Hills council's November 2012 approval of a zoning change for Joseph D'Andrea's property on Maple Lane has been cancelled.
Attorney Jonathan Kamin was scheduled to make a case against the decision —which rezoned about 10 acres off Maple Lane where D'Andrea planned to construct a two-story office building — at the Penn Hills Zoning Hearing Board meeting scheduled for Wednesday night.
Kamin said that appeal has been cancelled in light of council's July 15 approval of a new zoning amendment on the same property, one which municipal officials feel will better stand up to legal scrutiny.
“(The appeal) is now moot,” Kamin said.
The zoning hearing board will meet at 7 p.m. in the council chambers of the municipal building, located at 12245 Frankstown Road, to consider three other cases.
A county-court lawsuit relating to the November 2012 decision is still active in the Allegheny County Court of Common Pleas' online records database.
Patrick Varine is an editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7845 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.