'Stabilization team' to study west Frankstown area
By Patrick Varine
Published: Tuesday, Aug. 6, 2013, 6:49 p.m.
Traditionally, Pittsburghers do not look to Cleveland for much, except perhaps the twice-yearly occasion to mock the Browns when they play the Steelers.
But Penn Hills officials hope to apply a neighborhood stabilization model used in Cleveland to help reduce blight in certain areas and guide community improvement.
“We have an opportunity with the Pittsburgh Neighborhood Community Information System (PNCIS) representatives from the University of Pittsburgh to use graduate students in conjunction with (Penn Hills) Community Development Corp. volunteers to collect data and produce studies and maps that will better help our community,” Penn Hills Planning Director Howard Davidson told council members.
Robert Gradeck, a research specialist with Pitt's University Center for Social and Urban Research, will partner with municipal and CDC officials.
“Cleveland has done it,” Gradeck said. “What we're proposing is along the lines of a ‘neighborhood stabilization model' in Cleveland: assembling as much information as possible about the area.”
At monthly team meetings in Cleveland, several people including code enforcement officers, police officers, housing counselors, planners, CDC members and policy experts from Cleveland State University and Case Western Reserve University gathered to review and prioritize the latest information on properties, track progress on targeted parcels and design interventions for blighted properties and those at risk of abandonment.
In a Federal Reserve Board video on YouTube focusing on the Cleveland project, participants look at “destabilizing factors” — the first home to go into foreclosure on a particular block located across from a community park, for example — and try to find ways to keep the first domino from falling, so to speak.
“You want to deal with what's bad, near what's good, because resources are finite. We can't intervene in every foreclosure,” said Michael Schramm, a member of the Northeast Ohio Community and Neighborhood Data for Organizing. “But if we do something strategic, asset-based, we can start to make a difference.”
The free data system is part of the Center on Urban Poverty and Community Development, a research institute housed at Case Western.
The Penn Hills team's efforts will focus on the west Frankstown Road corridor, specifically Blocks 1 and 4 of Census Tract 5232. The borders of Block 1 are Verona Road to the north, Coal Hollow and Old Coal Hollow Road to the east, Frankstown Road to the south, and Robinson Boulevard to the west.
The borders of Block 4 are Frankstown Road to the north, Howard Street to the east, the Wilkinsburg border to the south and Robinson Boulevard to the west. The blocks encompass most of the municipality's Laketon Heights and Eastwood neighborhoods.
The Penn Hills Neighborhood Stabilization Team already has held three meetings, which take place at Laketon Methodist Church on Frankstown Road and have included members of the community, the church and the CDC, said Chris Blackwell of the planning department.
“Block Group 5232 has good housing stock and strong neighborhood assets,” Blackwell said.
Blackwell said his department plans to work closely with Gradeck and PNCIS staff “to study and develop a plan to stabilize this and other neighborhoods in Penn Hills.”
Through the combination of the west Frankstown study, along with a new program, CitizenServe, that the planning department is using, “we'll become familiar with new data, data sharing and mapping that will assist us in making a difference in these communities,” Blackwell said.
Anyone interested in attending the next meeting in September is asked to contact the planning department at 412-798-2128.
Patrick Varine is an editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7845 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.