Penn Hills police have arrested a Penn Hills man after a rash of thefts near the municipality's Universal neighborhood.
Between Aug. 17 and 19, 12 separate incidents of theft occurred on Twin Oak, Cedarwood and Cimarron drives.
Police Chief Howard Burton said the majority of thefts have been from backyard sheds and vehicles.
The value of stolen property ranges from less than $50 to more than $200.
Investigations Sgt. Michael Hudek said the case is ongoing, and police are not releasing the man's name.
Burton said thieves often will target areas with which they're familiar and can easily get around.
“They're maybe familiar with the area and know what's available,” he said. “They may be trying to start a lawn and garden business, because it's been lawnmowers and wheelbarrows, that type of thing.”
Hudek said the thefts have included a wide variety of lawn tools.
Burton advised residents to be alert, but added that protecting against this type of theft can be difficult.
“Lighting your backyard is a common thing, so you can see if people are around at night,” he said. “But a lot of these come about late at night, when people are already sleeping.”
The earliest morning theft was reported Aug. 19 at 7:30 a.m., on the 900 block of Cedarwood Drive.
The majority of thefts were reported between 5 and 9 p.m., according to police records.
Patrick Varine is an editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7845 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.