School board members look into tax amnesty program
Some Penn Hills school board members would like to see a tax amnesty program implemented.
At the district's Oct. 21 finance committee meeting, board member Carl Barbarino, who is not seeking re-election in November, asked if it was possible to “forgive penalties and interest until March for residents, so that we can try and collect some more of this ourselves before turning it over to Maiello Brungo & Maiello.”
The Wilkins Township law firm handles delinquent tax collection for the school district.
Through Sept. 30, over the last three years, the district has been able to collect, on average, 79 percent of taxes it is owed, about $28.2 million.
Business director Richard Liberto said by Dec. 31, the district will likely bring in another $3.5 million or so.
The remaining $3.5 million to $4 million in delinquent taxes is handed over to Maiello Brungo & Maiello for collection.
For 2013, Liberto told the finance committee that the district's tax collection is down about $100,000 from this same time last year, but “our collector feels confident with where they're at, because a lot more residents are signing up for the payment plan,” he said.
Barbarino said he'd like to see some leeway on penalties and interest.
“That's what's really killing people,” he said.
Board member Heather Hoolahan, who was in attendance at the meeting, said she recalled an amnesty program instituted about five years ago.
Liberto said representatives from Maiello Brungo & Maiello would be invited to the school board's November executive session to discuss possible amnesty options.
In 2013, school district officials estimate that taxable property in Penn Hills will generate $35.5 million.
Patrick Varine is an editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7845 or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.