ShareThis Page

ELECTION 2013: Molitierno, Calabrese join incumbents on Penn Hills school board

Patrick Varine
| Tuesday, Nov. 5, 2013, 10:24 p.m.

Newcomers Linda Molitierno and Pauline Calabrese will join incumbents Robert Hudak and Jennifer Burgess-Johnson on the Penn Hills School District Board of Directors.

Candidate William Phifer was the odd man out with all 50 precincts reporting around 11:40 p.m.; the top four vote-getters secured seats on the school board.

Molitierno and Calabrese had a strong showing, combining for more than 43 percent of the overall vote. Hudak and Burgess-Johnson had 23 percent and 19 percent, respectively.

“I'm very proud and I'm humbled that the people of Penn Hills have elected me to serve, and that's exactly what I will do,” said Burgess-Johnson, who was appointed to fill the board seat vacated by Linda Gallo in 2012. “I'm looking forward to representing Penn Hills on the state and national level in the appointed positions I serve in currently, and I'm looking forward to working with my fellow board members and pushing for change in our district.”

In total, 5,064 votes were cast at the 50 precincts in Penn Hills.

All results are unofficial until certified by the Allegheny County Division of Elections.

Patrick Varine is an editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7845 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.