ShareThis Page

Penn Hills, Verona men in U.S. District court on weapon, fraud charges

| Monday, Feb. 3, 2014, 11:03 a.m.

Men from Verona and Penn Hills were the subject of two U.S. District Court cases last week:

• Curtis D. Brown, 42, of Frankstown Road in Penn Hills was found guilty on Jan. 30 of violating federal firearms laws.

Brown, a convicted felon, was found guilty of illegally possessing a Taurus Model 85 Ultra Lite .38-caliber revolver on July 7, 2012. He was scheduled for sentencing on May 6.

Brown is potentially facing 15 years to life in prison.

• William D. Ray, 30, of Verona, was sentenced to 20 months in prison and two years of supervised release and will be required to help repay restitution in the amount of $2.4 million after being convicted of mail fraud.

Ray, along with Derek A. Candelore, 34, of Jeannette were employed by Penn-Star Energy LLC in Butler County as landmen, contacting mineral-rights owners on behalf of natural gas companies to arrange for leases. Penn-Star acquired rights on behalf of Range Resources.

According to information presented in court, rights for four separate blocks of Washington County land were stolen by Ray and Candelore using forged signatures, fake companies and forged notary signatures and stamps.

The fraud is alleged to have taken place from February 2011 to June 2012.

Ray participated in two of the four fraud schemes, according to the U.S. District Attorney's office, who said he profited more than $540,000 from the fraud.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.