Penn Hills council will vote on $18M borrowing proposal on Monday
Penn Hills council will vote on borrowing $18 million at tonight's (April 7) council meeting, in order to undertake a refunding project as well as to finance capital improvements.
Municipal Manager Moe Rayan could not be reached to comment on what specific projects the money would help to finance. In the 2014 municipal budget, roughly $329,000 is laid out in the capital improvements budget, including about $260,000 for sewer work, $30,000 for improvements to the municipal building on Frankstown Road and about $40,000 for stormwater management projects.
Revenue for those projects comes through grants and bond proceeds.
Other items on the agenda include:
• Awarding two contracts for about $1.6 million of work related to Phase VI of the 2014 sewer repairs. The first contract is for exvacation point repair of 135 sanitary sewer points. The second contract is for the lining repair of 265 sanitary sewer segments. The projects are required as part of the municipality's consent decree with the state's Department of Environmental Protection.
• A proposal by Rayan to appoint Maher Duessel as municipal auditors through 2016.
• Awarding a $52,000 contract for interceptor work along Thompson Run.
• Resident Joe Gula will address council regarding a sewer issue at his property on Saltsburg Road.
The meeting will take place at 7:30 p.m. at the municipal building, located at 12245 Frankstown Road. For more information, call 412-798-2100.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.