Penn Hills proposes 'suspending' 15 high school courses
Penn Hills School District officials may suspend 15 high school courses for the 2014-15 school year, because low enrollment in them is anticipated.
Many of the classes are second- and third-year continuations of other courses, such as Theatre Arts II, Psychology II and Foods III. But the idea still didn't sit well with some parents and educators at a school board finance committee meeting earlier this month.
“You look at our ranking” among other school districts, said parent Pat Boody. “We have a lot of students who aren't cutting it. But we have students who have found their niche and succeed, and now we say to them, ‘Sorry, you're not part of the greater good, and we're taking your niche away.'”
District officials said a combination of projected enrollment and a lack of resources are factors in considering the cuts.
“We have only so many classrooms, so many facilities, teachers and seats,” said Roger Myers, district technology manager.
“Those things have to line up, or else it makes it very difficult to schedule.”
Superintendent Thomas Washington said an examination of classes with low enrollment was needed for next year.
“They're not gone. We're suspending them at this point,” Washington said.
School board member Heather Hoolahan, who also is on the finance committee, said the district has to look longer-range.
“When we look at the big picture, we have to look at what allowed there to be classes with only three kids,” she said.
Penn Hills graduate Justin Calderone teaches a Journalism II class that is slated for suspension.
“Journalism II is the course that does the school newspaper, and that is terrible,” Calderone said.
“As a student, I took the creative writing class (also slated for suspension), and it inspired me to write.”
Renel Williams, the district's teaching, learning and assessment director, said the district isn't cutting the suspended programs.
“They'll still be offered next year, but kids have to sign up for it,” she said.
Some parents were skeptical. “My daughter's a freshman,” parent Donna Mercurio said. “By the time she's a senior, how many more things will be cut?”
Williams didn't disclose current or projected enrollments for the classes, noting that students still were signing up for classes.
High school Principal Eric Kostic said only one or two entry-level courses were on the list for suspension.
“The kids have had Journalism I, they've had Digital Photography I. So the things that won't be offered next year, we haven't taken them completely away from the kids,” he said.
“I wish we could offer everything, but right now they're on hold.”
Kostic said based on 2014-15 sign-ups, “there are maybe 105 seniors who won't be able to take these classes,” he said, referring to the courses on the list for suspension. “But for juniors, I would hope they'd be able to take them in the 2015-16 school year.”
Hoolahan said the courses that might be suspended “will be offered next year, and if we can talk them up and enough kids sign up for them they'll be back.”
Calderone said that with high numbers of students leaving Penn Hills for charters and other options, suspending classes was not the way to go.
More than 750 students who live in the district attend a charter or cyber school, and the district estimates payments to those schools will top $12 million next year.
“People are leaving in droves, and when the news gets out that we're dropping programs that Gateway and other districts have, more will leave,” he said.
Patrick Varine is an editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7845 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.