Penn Hills ties for most players in East/West All-Star game
Penn Hills football didn't just have the most representation at the 2014 Pennsylvania Scholastic Football Coaches Association East/West All-Star Game on May 5.
Shawn Featherstone, Joe Navari, Jon Pawlowski and Mike Anthony also got the chance to show off their talents just a few miles down the road, with the game taking place at Franklin Regional High School. Penn Hills, along with Academy Park High School outside Philadelphia, both had four players selected for the annual all-star game.
Head football coach and athletic director John Peterman said having that many players on the roster “says a lot for where we're headed.”
“Our program is getting ready to take the turn,” Peterman said. “This coming year, we may have even more (players) on the East/West and Big 33 rosters.”
Peterman said the four East/West All-Stars will be missed, adding that they've grown immensely during their time with the football program.
“Shawn's actions speak for themselves — he's got unbelievable ability, and he's going to a Division I program at (the University of) Akron,” Peterman said.
“Mike has a great body and the ability to play wide receiver and safety, or bulk up when he goes to school and play tight end.
“Joe has worked his tail off to make the most of himself, being 5-feet-10-inches as an offensive and defensive lineman and is doing a great job. And Jon did an outstanding job on the (offensive) line in the East/West game.”
The Indians finished their 2013 season 5-5 (4-4 in section), falling in the first round of the WPIAL playoffs to Penn-Trafford, 22-16.
Patrick Varine is an editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7845 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.