ShareThis Page

Ambulance fundraiser fliers sent beyond Verona borders

Patrick Varine
| Friday, May 30, 2014, 3:18 p.m.

Penn Hills EMS Supervisor Diane Fitzhenry wants Penn Hills residents to know they already pay for an ambulance service with their taxes, and don't need to contribute to a private company serving the adjacent town.

Fitzhenry sent out an email alert to residents on May 28 regarding solicitation for contributions by Guardian Angel Ambulance Services, a privately owned, for-profit service based in West Mifflin.

“They're certainly entitled to do this,” Fitzhenry said. “It's free enterprise. It's just very misleading, because they're soliciting people who already have a designated ambulance service.”

The municipality has funded equipment and costs for Penn Hills EMS for four decades, she said.

Guardian Angel does contract with Verona Borough for ambulance service, and its operations manager, Mark Capozzi, said the solicitation was a mistake related to the way post-office distribution takes place.

“Ever since we've had Verona, we've sent out these letters for Verona residents,” Capozzi said. “So every year when we send these out, they go to the zip code that covers Verona (15147).”

However, according to the way the post office distributes mail, “Verona” also includes most of Penn Hills north of Saltsburg Road. Capozzi said the printing company which agreed to mail the solicitation fliers sent it to all of the 15147 zip code, “which unfortunately crossed over into Penn Hills,” he said.

Capozzi said he called Fitzhenry to explain what happened.

“Some of the letters go outside Verona proper,” he said. “It has never been a problem until this year, when a (letter recipient) found it to be offensive and made a huge deal about it, not only on Facebook but other social-media sites.”

The mailings also have affected Plum. The East Oakmont section of the borough is in the 15147 zip code.

Bob Moran, deputy director of Plum Emergency Medical Services, the ambulance company that serves Plum Borough, said some residents in the East Oakmont section received Guardian Angel subscription letter requests.

“There is no reason to send money to Guardian Angel if we are your provider,” Moran said. “When you call 911, you will get Plum EMS.”

A subscription to Plum EMS is $40 a year.

In light of the mix-up, Moran said he contacted Longwood at Oakmont, a retirement community on Route 909 that is in the 15147 zip code area, to inform officials about the potential for residents to receive the Guardian Angel subscription letters.

Guardian Angel responds to about 350 calls per year in Verona, according to borough manager Bonnie Conway. The service keeps one or two ambulances in the area on a regular basis to answer calls.

Not everyone is clear on the distinction between the services, however.

Fitzhenry said Penn Hills emergency responders brought a patient to the hospital on May 28, and the patient was confused when Guardian Angel did not show up.

“She had answered the flier and sent them a check,” Fitzhenry said. “But when she calls 911, she's never going to get a Guardian Angel ambulance. We're the designated service.”

Capozzi said that is not necessarily the case.

“Being that we're part of 911, it's not that far-fetched that if there's a call that someone's having a cardiac event in Penn Hills, and they know we're closest to the call, they're going to dispatch us,” he said.

“The whole thing about the solicitation was not to take money or calls from Penn Hills. We're no different than any other service. We're looking to ask our residents of Verona if they're inclined to support Guardian Angel.”

Fitzhenry said she simply feels obligated to let her residents know: they don't need to answer the letters.

“(Guardian Angel) certainly has the right to do whatever they want,” she said. “My ultimate concern is protecting the residents in the community that I serve.”

Patrick Varine is an editor for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7845 or Staff writer Karen Zapf contributed to this story.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.