Daykon quits Trafford Council during contentious meeting
Trafford Councilman John Daykon hastily resigned and Council President Rich Laird called police to maintain order after a discussion Tuesday night about a grant for the volunteer fire department erupted into a shouting match.
Daykon, a councilman since spring 2010, abruptly turned in his key to the borough offices and left the meeting after a heated exchange with Councilman Frank Bruno, whom Daykon replaced earlier this year as finance chairman.
Mayor Rey Peduzzi said the borough is losing a “very valuable asset to the community.”
He credited Daykon for solidifying Trafford's finances after council overspent on a new public safety building by hundreds of thousands of dollars.“I think that's a tremendous injustice to this borough,” Peduzzi said.
Council didn't act immediately to accept Daykon's resignation before adjourning into an executive session. The flared tempers resulted from a discussion about an $8,000 grant that members of the Trafford Fire Company — one of the primary tenants of the new public safety building, which that triggered the borough's financial problems this year — say the borough owes them.
Details of the grant were included in a January resolution passed by council, but Daykon and fellow council members Vicki Megon and Henry Schultz said Bruno didn't outline the grant payment before the vote. The resolution passed 5-2, with Daykon and Schultz dissenting.
In the resolution, council agreed to transfer ownership of a firetruck to the department. It also called for Council to “make a discretionary contribution of $8,000 to TFC for the 2012 year as previously promised.”
Council members disputed the extent to which the grant was discussed in public and the argument included Bruno calling Daykon a liar.
“I'm sick of it,” Bruno said. “I'm sick of the lies.”
Daykon repeatedly said “I'm done” and indicated he was leaving the meeting, but offered his resignation as the quarrel continued.
“I will not be called a liar,” Daykon said.
Before he left the meeting, Daykon said the fire department actually owes the borough $8,224.
Of that, $6,388 is from construction change orders the department requested and pledged to cover for the new fire station, he said.
Another $1,836 relates to damage caused when firefighters drilled into the Plexiglas near a fire alarm at the station.
“By them doing that boneheaded move of drilling holes and resetting (the alarm), in addition to causing $1,800 (in damage), they voided the warranty,” Daykon said.
Fire Chief Brian Lindbloom — who arrived at the meeting after that comment — said the firefighters had to gain access to the alarm because it was going off several times and they didn't have a key to the device.
Megon disputed that and claimed they did have a key.
Council members intend to resume the discussion at their Jan. 15 meeting.
Chris Foreman is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400 ext. 8671 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.