Manor Council sets borough manager's raise at 3 percent
By Chris Foreman
Published: Wednesday, Jan. 2, 2013, 8:58 p.m.
Manor Council is including a 3-percent salary increase for Manager Joe Lapia in the 2013 budget, which will not require an increase in property taxes.
After discussing Lapia's pay in executive sessions, council voted 6-0 last month to boost his annual salary to $35,020. Councilman Jeff Herman was absent for the vote on Dec. 19.
Councilman Brian Woy said the board settled on 3 percent to keep Lapia's raise within range of other borough employees, who will take home between 2.5 percent and 4.5 percent more next year.
Woy commended Lapia for recently securing a $13,612 credit from West Penn Power because of a billing error for 12 street lights that don‘t exist.
“He's been doing a good job and saving us money,” said Woy, chairman of the administration and finance committee. “He's definitely been streamlining the office.”
The borough doesn‘t pay for Lapia‘s health insurance, but it covers his dental and vision insurance.
When council initially drafted the budget, the line item for Lapia's salary showed a nearly 9-percent increase, but Woy emphasized at the time that no figure was finalized until further discussion by council.
Lapia, a retired state police sergeant, was a Manor councilman until his appointment as the borough's first manager in August 2010. His starting salary was $32,000.
Chris Foreman is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400 ext. 8671 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Garden Q&A: Firecracker vine OK for trellis?
- Starkey: Penguins’ arrogance astounding
- Lone & flocking legal eagles
- More women seize opportunities to start businesses
- Matt Calvert’s goal in double OT evens series for Blue Jackets
- Penguins’ Gibbons scores twice but leaves with apparent injury
- Patients denied as donor organs discarded
- Film tax credits bill would bump up state budget
- Draftees’ longevity key for NFL success
- State police: People injured in Parkway crash resulting from police chase
- Kovacevic: Panic over Pirates? In April?