Penn-Trafford HR director Pope resigns
The Penn-Trafford School District is eliminating the position of human resources director after the school board this week accepted the former director's resignation.
Board members voted 8-0 to accept Ramona Pope's resignation, effective Dec. 26, “under the terms and conditions agreed to by the parties,” according to the language that officials voted on. School board member Bruce Newell was absent from the Jan. 14 meeting.
The terms and conditions that the school board voted on were not disclosed.
In November, the school board approved a medical leave for Pope, 51, of Verona, through April.
Board President Jay Tray and Superintendent Tom Butler said they couldn't discuss Pope's resignation because of the confidentiality of personnel issues.
Solicitor Russell Lucas said the district has no comment about Pope's resignation.
A listed phone number for Pope was not in service.
Hired in June 2009 at an annual salary of $92,000, Pope was the first person to have the title of human resources for the district. She previously worked in the same position for the Wilkinsburg School District and was payroll officer for the Penn Hills School District.
Pope's former duties have been divided among five administrative employees, Butler said.
“It's been very seamless, so that's why we're comfortable that we won't have to replace her,” he said.
One of the administrators who will take on more of the human resources work is Joan Wehner, the assistant to the director of financial planning and business affairs. This week, the board extended her contract from March 25, 2013, to June 30, 2018, for $58,000 a year. Board members initially hired Wehner in March 2010 for a three-year contract for $48,000 a year.
Chris Foreman is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400 ext. 8671 or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.