ShareThis Page

Trafford officials to tally amount owed before issuing check

| Wednesday, Jan. 23, 2013, 9:02 p.m.

Trafford Council now intends to follow through on paying a disputed $8,000 grant to the Trafford Fire Company, but the transaction won't be as simple as cutting a check.

Council members said they still have to confirm how much the department owes the borough for some work on the new public-safety building and damage caused to the new fire-alarm control panel when the alarm wouldn't shut off.

And the fire chief insists the department would be owed money if the company and town compared bills.

Council President Rich Laird said last week that borough officials would follow through on the grant, which initially was included in the 2012 budget. That's a change of heart from September, when officials said they wouldn't pay it because they questioned how much about the grant was discussed in public.

Wording about a “discretionary contribution” of $8,000 to the department was included in a January 2012 resolution in which council voted 5-2 to transfer ownership of a fire truck to the firefighters.

“The resolution was not read completely when it was voted on, so for some, it probably was a blind vote, but it was voted on, so we're going to honor that $8,000,” Laird said.

Despite being willing to pay the money, Laird said, it's possible the firefighters might owe the borough about $225 instead.

Council members said the firefighters owe $6,388 for a previously approved alteration to the new building. The borough also has an invoice for $1,836 to repair the alarm panel.

Before the firefighters had a key to the building, they drilled three small holes into a piece of plastic to insert a straw to disable the alarm, which had been going off for two hours, fire Chief Brian Lindbloom said.

By doing that, they also damaged a piece of plastic film on the electrical box.

Lindbloom said the borough will end up owing the department because the firefighters put up $10,000 to help pay for changes to the building when the borough was struggling financially last year.

“We can compare invoices and figure out how much you owe us and how much we owe you, but I promise you it's going to come out with the fire department being owed money,” Lindbloom said.

“The borough didn't have the money to pay anything at the time, yet the building could not stop,” he added.

As for the fire alarm, council directed Solicitor Craig Alexander to research if the damage would void the warranty on the system purchased through Keystone Electrical Systems of North Versailles.

Chris Foreman is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 8671, or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.