Manor officials already considering salt purchase for next winter
With less than a month left in this winter, Manor officials already are considering how much road salt they should buy for the next snowy season.
Borough manager Joe Lapia is recommending that council commit to buying 400 tons through a state-negotiated contract. Under the terms, Manor would be required to take at least 60 percent of that amount — 240 tons — but wouldn't be permitted to buy more than 520 tons.
Public-works employees have used about 270 tons this year, with another 250 in storage, as of last week, Lapia said.
“Typically, I think we use 400 to 500 tons, unless it's a really bad winter,” he said.
Manor is spending $52.92 per ton on salt this year. The price for next year has not been set yet, Lapia said.
Council President Chuck Konkus asked Lapia to present council with the worst-case scenario for salt usage at its March 6 public meeting.
“I wouldn't want us to undersell ourselves,” Konkus said. “I always want us to be prepared.”
The community room in the borough building soon will have new tables.
Council agreed to buy 30 30-inch-by-96-inch collapsible tables from Hampton Office Products for $2,660. Two-wheeled travel carts will cost another $510.
Officials said the old tables were starting to wear down, sometimes snagging visitors' sleeves. They will be posted for sale on the Municibid online auction site.
“That's a much-needed improvement,” Konkus said.
Council is paying for the tables from the community-room fund, which had about $15,000 in it, as of the end of January, Lapia said.
Access to a Sam's Club credit card through the borough will make food and drink purchases easier for the Manor Recreation Board, Councilman Bruce Hartman said.
Hartman requested the card last week because of the difficulty he said rec board members have had in trying to get an invoice from Sam's Club for items for holiday parties and other events. Council authorized the opening of an account that would limit the users to Hartman and Lapia.
New state regulations that took effect last year require borough council to maintain the rec board's funds, but, Hartman said, it was a burden for borough volunteers to front hundreds of dollars in some cases until they could be reimbursed. Council also doesn't reimburse rec board members for any taxes on purchases.
“They're punishing everybody, when they should be punishing the people who abused the system,” Hartman said of the changes to the Pennsylvania Borough Code.
Lapia said the purchase of another lawn mower would enable the public-works department to finish cutting all of the grass on borough properties and at parks in one day instead of two.
He presented council last week with a $14,773 quote for a John Deere 997 and a $12,018 quote for a Ferris zero-turn mower, but council didn't commit to a purchase. Both prices are from state purchasing contracts.
With a third full-time public-works employee on staff this year and summer part-time help in the budget, Lapia said, employees could finish the task sooner than in past years.
A new mower is not included in the 2013 budget.
Council is considering installing a new sidewalk along Route 993 between First and Poplar streets.
Konkus said the borough removed the sidewalk a few years ago as part of a road project by the state Department of Transportation but hasn't replaced it. He said he sees mothers using strollers in that section of town, and he is worried about the safety of missing part of the sidewalk.
“If we're going to be spending money on lawn mowers — not that I'm saying we don't need it — we've got to do something with that sidewalk,” Konkus said.
Officials are determining how much it would cost to put a new sidewalk in.
Chris Foreman is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 8671, or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.