County frees up $30K for demolition of former Trafford station
Less than a year after firefighters moved into a new public safety center in Trafford, borough and Westmoreland County officials are making plans to demolish the old fire station on Duquesne Avenue.
County officials have set a May 17 deadline for accepting bids to tear down the century-old station, which also housed the municipal offices until 2007.
The county's redevelopment authority has set aside about $30,000 for the project, which also could include removal of one or both staircases connecting Duquesne to Edgewood Avenue, Councilwoman Vicki Megon said. The county is using federal money designated for the removal of blighted properties in central business districts for the project. County officials intend to request separate bids for the station and the steps.
At minimum, Trafford would be responsible for paying $1,000 toward the project for aspects such as an environmental inspection and advertisement for bids. Council could decide to incur extra expenses to cover the station demolition or removal of the staircases if the project exceeds $30,000, Megon said.
Hallie Chatfield, the county's revitalization coordinator, said the Trafford property was chosen because of the potential for a redevelopment project there.
Renee Cappetta, president of the Trafford Economic and Community Development Corp., said she thinks the property could attract a developer who would build a multi-floor structure featuring a storefront and apartments.
“If they can come in on a ready lot, that is so desirable for them,” Cappetta said.
Chris Foreman is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 8671, or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.