Manor officials consider turning off one-fourth of streetlights
Manor officials are considering a plan to eliminate about one-fourth of the street lights in the borough but retain all of the lights at intersections.
Council members reviewed a list of possible lights to shut off at their meeting last week but tabled potential action until the next meeting on April 3 at 7 p.m.
Officials initially broached the topic of turning off some of the lights about three years ago as a cost-savings measure.
The proposal council is considering would eliminate 52 lights, with another six up for discussion.
Officials didn't indicate the amount of money that could be saved by cutting power to the lights, but $8,750 is a quarter of the 2013 street light budget.
Council reduced its 2013 budget for street lighting by $5,000 to $35,000. In December, Manor received a $13,600 credit from West Penn Power because of a billing error for 12 street lights that don't exist.
Many of the lights that are targeted by the plan are on Sandy Hill Road and Manor Harrison City Road. A handful of the lights along the western side of Sandy Hill Road actually are in North Huntingdon, Manager Joe Lapia said.
Others could go off in various residential neighborhoods.
Chris Foreman is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 8671, or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Ray Rice wins appeal, suspension vacated
- UPMC researcher died of acute cyanide poisoning, medical examiner says
- Website ranks Hampton among nation’s top schools
- Witnesses help identify 2nd teen charged in killing Andre Roberts
- No decision yet on charges against elderly driver who struck and killed pregnant woman
- Aspinwall business adds color to holiday spirit
- Photo of suspect in Greendale Tavern burglary/fire released
- Northern Cambria man accused of attempted rape
- Ex-House Democratic leader DeWeese seeks new trial
- Icy roads cause accidents, slow traffic across Western Pa.
- Washington Co. couple sues Range Resources over drilling, water