PTARC offers $5,000 to help with Fairmont Park project in Trafford
The Friends of Penn-Trafford Area Recreation Commission has pledged a $5,000 grant toward a playground reconfiguration project at Fairmont Park if Trafford officials decide to make it a priority.
The nonprofit group awarded the grant this month to the Trafford Recreation Board, which had requested $10,000 toward an estimated $60,000 project.
The grant is contingent on project approval by Trafford Council and the state Department of Conservation and Natural Resources or any other state agency providing funding.
“The playground does need to be replaced,” said Linda Iams, the group's chairwoman. “It's going to make it a safer playground.”
The rec board wanted to apply for a DCNR grant for the playground project by an April 10 deadline, but borough council members said the board would have to submit a detailed funding proposal to receive council's support.
Because of that request from council, rec board members said they wouldn't be able to meet the April deadline.
Another potential grant source this summer is the Commonwealth Financing Authority through the state Department of Community and Economic Development.
Chris Foreman is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 8671, or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.