Geese cause problems at Penn Township Municipal Park
Flustered by the geese population at the municipal park, Penn Township officials have tried using dogs, sprays and dead-geese decoys to try to shoo them away.
The next option they might consider is a night-time light intended to disrupt their sleeping patterns and force them to find a new home.
The Penn Township Recreation Commission is researching a light system sold by an Ohio company called Away With Geese.
The business sells solar-powered units that emit an amber light over a three-and-a-half acre area.
But none of the commission members said they knew of any municipalities in the region that have the lights.
They also aren't sure if the lights — which are estimated to cost more than $3,000 for seven units scattered through the park — are affordable because they weren't budgeted.
“Somebody around here should be using this if it works as great as they say it does,” rec board member Phil Kochasic said.
Chairman Paul Wersing said the park is considered a prime spot for the geese because there are 10 baseball fields and a pond there to attract them.
One goose can eat about four pounds of grass a day, according to the Away With Geese website.
“In my opinion, it seems like it's gotten worse in the past year,” rec board member Mike Ginsburg said.
The board approved an Aug. 4 rain date for the Schaab Memorial Tournament at the municipal park.
The second annual softball tournament in memory of two homicide victims is scheduled for July 28 at the park.
Bushy Run donation
Board members agreed to donate $1,500 to the Bushy Run Battlefield Heritage Society's 250th anniversary commemoration on Aug. 3 and 4.
Chris Foreman is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 8671, or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.