Interest in cell tower renews Manor efforts to create ordinance
By Chris Foreman
Published: Wednesday, April 10, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
Manor officials are planning to restart work on an ordinance that would govern the placement of telecommunication towers.
The efforts are in reaction to a Chicago company's proposition that it might consider Manor property for the location of a new tower. Council members said they aren't enthusiastic about NTP Wireless's interest in Lower Manor Park.
Manager Joe Lapia said borough officials likely would have to have an ordinance in place to be considered by NTP.
The borough's planning commission discussed an ordinance in late 2011 and early 2012 but never recommended a draft to council. Commission members intend to resume discussion on an ordinance at a meeting in April or May.
Councilmen Jeff Herman and James Morgan said they were opposed to NTP's interest in the park. The company proposed the potential leasing of a 100-foot-by-100-foot section of the park near the skate park.
“I don't think right in the middle of the park is an appropriate place for it,” Herman said.
Morgan suggested open space near the Irwin Sportsmen's Association might be a better location.
Chris Foreman is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 8671, or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.