Homeowner asks Penn Township to remove brush at municipal park
A longtime homeowner whose property borders the Penn Township Municipal Park wants township officials to clear out the thicket of trees, vines and brush that has served as buffer between his property and playground and pavilion area since the late 1990s.
Township commissioners last week asked manager Bruce Light to provide an estimate to clean up the wooded area but haven't committed to complying with John Poznick's request. Commissioner Paul Wersing also suggested a Boy Scout troop might be willing to volunteer for a project.
Poznick, a retired carpenter who has lived on Raymaley Road for 47 years, complained to the commissioners that the woods are an eyesore of decaying trees. He said he fears the area might attract termites to his home.
Township maintenance workers pruned the area last fall, but “they left a mess, and it looks like hell,” Poznick said.
“You look at this, here, and it's a jungle,” he added.
Tom Lamacz, public-works director for the township, declined comment.
The township paid the Shipkosky family $15,000 for the one-acre strip of land in 1997, one year after the Warrior Wonderland playground opened.
Though Light said the woods are “particularly unsightly” after the winter season, he recommends that the commissioners preserve the buffer.
The township doesn't have any money budgeted for a clearing of the woods this year, and township public-works employees already are focused on maintenance of more than 60 retention ponds in housing plans, Light said.
“Even if the cost is not an issue, I think it's contrary to have a park in a residential neighborhood,” Light said.
Chris Foreman is a staff writer for Trib Total Media.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.