Redevelopment authority set to approve demolition of old Trafford fire station
Demolition of Trafford's former fire station and municipal building could start in mid-June after the Westmoreland County redevelopment authority approves a contract for the apparent low bidder.
At $19,900, A.W. McNabb LLC of Burgettstown in Washington County submitted the lowest of seven bids by the deadline Friday to tear down the Duquesne Avenue building and the two staircases that link Duquesne to Edgewood Avenue, authority executive director April Kopas said Monday.
McNabb's proposal is about two-thirds of the $30,000 that the authority reserved for the project from federal funding that targets blighted properties in central business districts.
Trafford, which will retain ownership of the property, is responsible for paying $1,000 of the cost.
“We're very pleased because we can take that savings and pass it on to another community, so, for us, it's a win-win,” Kopas said.
The authority's board will review the bids and likely approve McNabb at its next meeting on Tuesday, she said. McNabb is in line for a 75-day contract, which means construction likely will be completed by the end of August.
Kopas said the company is “well-qualified” and experienced in projects involving asbestos abatement. Borough officials have said there is asbestos in the former station, which is more than 100 years old.
McNabb received a $93,580 contract from the authority in January to remove nine downtown Latrobe buildings as part of the Westmoreland County Community College's plan for a replacement of the Laurel Education Center.
Chris Foreman is a staff writer for Trib Total Media.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.