Penn-Trafford puts cap on high school costs
The Penn-Trafford School Board will cap a construction project at the high school to $32 million to avoid raising taxes.
Before unanimously approving that limit on Monday, each board member took a few minutes to explain his or her reasoning for supporting a plan that district officials say can be financed within the district's existing debt structure over a 12-year period.
The district will be able to pay off the work, they say, by rolling over the millage set aside for debts that will expire in the next few years to repay the bonds taken out to cover the high school project.
Board President P. Jay Tray said afterward that the consensus was that the district should do what it could afford without raising taxes, based on comments from residents.
“We think we've come up with a reasonable compromise that's good for our kids and good for our taxpayers,” Tray said.
The $32 million figure matches the estimate for a plan devised by the district's project manager and architect that Penn-Trafford officials publicized in May.
That plan includes plumbing, electrical and heating, ventilation and air-conditioning work; new science labs and remodeling of classrooms; new kitchen equipment and other work in the kitchen and cafeteria; new seats, rigging and acoustical work in the auditorium; library and locker room improvements; better lighting in the parking lots; 66 new parking spaces; and a new bus loop.
Superintendent Thomas Butler said the design of the project should be finished within three to five months, putting the district on track to seek bids in January and start construction next June.
Despite agreeing to spend as much as $32 million, board members lamented that the project will not cover all of the desired improvements, such as a new auxiliary gym that would have cost $3.5 million or upgrades to the swimming pool.
Marty Stovar estimated that $15 million to $17 million of the work is going into “the bones” of the school.
“We won't aesthetically see those changes, but they need to be done,” Stovar said. “That's eating up half of the budget, so, with what's left, there are a lot of great things being done in the classrooms.”
Board member Dallas Leonard, who heads the building and grounds committee, likened the board's direction to a person buying the car that he can afford instead of a flashier model.
He then offered another image of what Penn-Trafford is trying to do without raising taxes.
“We have to try to get 10 gallons of water into a five-gallon bucket,” Leonard said.
Chris Foreman is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 8671, or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.