Penn-Trafford board approves budget with to tax hike
By Chris Foreman
Published: Wednesday, June 12, 2013, 9:42 a.m.
The property tax rate in the Penn-Trafford School District won't increase for the 2013-14 school year to help pay for the district's $49.3-million budget.
Though the district is embarking on a construction project at the high school, board members agreed to keep the tax rate at 74.85 mills for most property owners and 14.43 mills for the Trafford properties that are in Allegheny County.
That means that the owner of a home in Westmoreland County with the median assessed value of $25,030 would pay $1,873 a year in property taxes with the current rate. In Allegheny County, the owner of a home assessed at $75,000 would pay $1,082 a year.
The board unanimously kept the same tax rate for 2013-14 despite board member Nick Petrucci's suggestion last week that officials consider a tax increase to raise revenue for building improvements.
In the new budget, the district is not replacing eight of the nine teaching positions that were opened through retirements. Penn-Trafford also eliminated its human-resources position.
The budget shows that district officials estimate they will begin the new fiscal year on July 1 — and end it a year later — with a fund balance of $3.9 million.
Of that total, the board has designated $2.4 million for building-project or pension expenses.
Chris Foreman is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 8671, or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Longtime administrator fired by Trafford Council
- Level Green man faces child pornography charges
- Hempfield court loss could save PTARC cash