Trafford to assess condition of First Street sewer line
After finding two collapsed storm-sewer sections under First Street, Trafford officials want a contractor to use cameras to assess the line to determine if other repairs are necessary.
Last week, council voted 6-0, with Henry Schultz absent, to pay $5,000 to State Pipe Services of Cranberry Township to take video of sewer line.
Borough engineer Don Glenn said borough officials decided it was beneficial to evaluate the condition of the entire 60-inch sewer line in case there are other problems with it.
Officials already know about a collapse in the line near the parking area for Irwin Interiors System and a collapsed sewer inlet at the First Street intersection with Adrian Avenue. Glenn didn't give an estimate for how much those repairs could cost.
The safety of eight homes along the First Street line was one of the reasons officials cited for taking video of the line.
“For liability reasons, I really think we need to know if there's any movement happening there,” Councilman Casey Shoub said.
Councilman John Daykon said an audit report of borough operations in 2012 “significantly improved” from the previous year.
Auditing firm Maher Duessel found that Trafford is “moving in a very positive direction” after it turned in a recommendation report that was about a page and a half instead of the eight-page report from 2011, Daykon said.
Among the changes since the last report, council consolidated borough accounts from 17 to four to better manage finances and put policies into place to ensure expenses are paid from the assigned budgeted line item.
Councilwoman Vicki Megon credited Daykon, who became finance chairman in March 2012, for the good report.
“He's done a phenomenal job in a very short period of time from taking us from one end of the scale to the other and implementing a lot of policies and procedures that should have been in place,” she said.
Trafford's old police station might hit the auction block after nobody submitted a bid by council's June 17 deadline to buy the building at Brinton Avenue and Fifth Street.
Borough officials decided to look into the cost of using an auctioneer to sell the property.
“We need to get rid of it,” Megon said. “It's an asset that could make us a little bit of money.”
Council was hoping to receive a bid of least $80,000 for the building, which has been empty since the police moved into the public safety building last year.
After no increase in their pension payments since 2006, former Trafford police chiefs Charles Noll and Ron Troy are getting a 3-percent increase in their pensions for this year, retroactive to Jan. 1.
Daykon said the 3-percent raise doesn't come close to the increase they would have received over the past seven years if council had been giving the former chiefs an annual raise tied to the cost-of-living adjustment, or COLA. That rate now is 1.6 percent, Daykon said.
“I think 3 percent is the least we can do,” he said.
Council members said they intend to grant an annual cost-of-living raise to police pension recipients starting in 2014.
Another former Trafford Recreation Board member is returning to the board.
Dominick Frollini Jr. is joining his wife, Rosemary, whom council brought back onto the board in April.
One seat remains open on the board.
Chris Foreman is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 8671, or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.