Trafford added as defendant in property-usage lawsuit
A contractor hired by Trafford Council to replace sewage lines under First Street has pulled the borough into a lawsuit involving the company's use of private property as a staging area for the $400,000 project.
Officials of A. Liberoni Inc. filed a complaint in Westmoreland County Common Pleas Court last month to add the borough of Trafford as a defendant in a lawsuit against filed by James J. Bruno of North Huntingdon.
Bruno initially sued A. Liberoni in April. In the lawsuit, he accused the company of trespassing and unjust enrichment by using property he owns at 90 and 90½ First St. in 2011 to store excavation equipment without his permission.
But A. Liberoni officials said in the suit that Trafford alone should be responsible for any potential damages. According to the complaint, company officials are accusing unspecified Trafford officials of “representing” that the company could use Bruno's property because he was delinquent on his taxes and that the borough was foreclosing on the property.
Neither A. Liberoni's attorney, W. Robert Ament, nor Bruno's attorney, P. William Bercik, was available for comment about the complaint.
Trafford Council President Rich Laird said he didn't have any information about the complaint.
Bruno and Bercik approached council in November to ask for compensation because of A. Liberoni's use of the property and other damage Bruno said happened when volunteer firefighters practiced there.
At that time, Alexander told Bruno the borough was not going to pay him for the use of the property.
Alexander also said then that Bruno has filed tax-assessment appeals to Westmoreland County saying his property is worth nothing.
Bruno, who is a cousin of former Councilman Frank Bruno, wants to use the property to build townhouses, Bercik said last year.
Chris Foreman is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 8671, or email@example.com.
Subscribe today! Click here for our subscription offers.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.