A yearlong renovation at the Central Westmoreland Career and Technology Center began this week after all nine of the member districts approved the $6.5 million project.
The New Stanton-based center is pursuing the project under the guidelines of the Guaranteed Energy Savings Act after the nine school boards signed off on Johnson Controls Inc. as the contractor.
Vo-tech officials are moving forward with the project after scrapping a previous version in January that was estimated to cost $9 million.
In September, Penn-Trafford became the first district to give public support for a project. By June, when the nine school boards formally voted on this proposal, none of the individual board members voted against it.
“I feel very good about that,” said Nick Petrucci, Penn-Trafford's representative to the vo-tech. “There was not one dissenting vote.”
An average of 88 Penn-Trafford students has enrolled at the center each year over the past five years. The district's annual contribution to the vo-tech will increase by about $45,000 for 15 years to help pay for construction financing.
The center's assistant director, Jeffrey Geesey, said construction began on Monday.
Among the scheduled work, crews will upgrade the building's heating and cooling systems and electrical infrastructure and replace the roof and the auto-shop and welding-lab exhaust systems, Geesey said.
Chris Foreman is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 8671, or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.