Penn-Trafford enrollment down, but not as much as other districts
Though Penn-Trafford's enrollment fell by 15 percent over the past decade, 10 other Westmoreland County school districts lost a higher percentage of students, state Department of Education records show.
Penn-Trafford officials released the data Monday after board President P. Jay Tray mentioned the countywide decline in student population — 13 percent over the past decade — at last week's public meeting.
Tray broached the topic amid discussion that school board presidents will meet through the Westmoreland Intermediate Unit to address matters common to all districts.
The presidents plan to hold a first meeting in October, he said.
“This will be on an ongoing basis as we attempt to begin the process of sharing concerns and maybe services, at one stage,” Tray said.
In 2012-13, Penn-Trafford had 4,101 students, 733 less than in the 2002-03 school year and ranking fourth among the 17 districts in the county. District officials are expecting to enroll 4,081 students this month, said Matt Harris, interim Superintendent.
The biggest drop was in the neighboring Jeannette district. Its 1,106 students in 2012-13 represented a 27-percent decline since 2002-03. Another neighbor, Hempfield, remained at the top of the list with 6,078, though that was 532 fewer than 10 years ago.
Only Norwin, the county's second-largest district, had any growth. It gained 57 students over the past decade to reach 5,207 last year. Even that was only a 1-percent increase.
Chris Foreman is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 8671, or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.