Trafford's Democratic, Republican committee leaders to choose 2-year candidates
Democratic and Republican committee leaders in Trafford have until mid-September to choose candidates to run for a two-year seat on Trafford Council.
The candidates will compete in the Nov. 5 election to serve the remaining two years of a four-year term originally won by Frank Bruno, who resigned in February.
Jay Race, whom council subsequently appointed to fill the seat through the end of the year, is running for a four-year term after winning a Democratic nomination in May.
Because Trafford officials missed a Feb. 19 deadline to include the two-year seat on the primary ballot, party officials will select the nominees.
Westmoreland County elections director James Montini said Sept. 16 is the deadline for the parties to submit their candidates' names for the fall ballot.
So far, no candidates have announced their intention to run for the seat, party officials said.
“We've talked about some people, but we haven't come to any conclusions yet,” said Mary Dobos, a Trafford Democratic committeewoman who won a write-in campaign to be the Democratic candidate for mayor.
Cheryl Petersen, who finished behind the four Democratic nominees for council in May, said she isn't sure if she will try for the two-year seat.
The GOP also is in the early stages of identifying candidates, said Ron Rometo, chairman of the county party's district that covers Trafford.
“I wouldn't mind having three or four (candidates) and interviewing them,” he said.
Chris Foreman is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 8671, or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.