Stop signs coming to Walton Crossings
Penn Township officials are heeding a homeowner's request to install two more stop signs at the intersection of Trail Side Court and Putter Trail in the Walton Crossings housing plan because of sight-distance issues for drivers and pedestrians.
Manager Bruce Light said on Monday that a three-way stop at the intersection is warranted after he completed an engineering study.
Commissioners last week agreed to review the safety of the intersection after a Trail Side homeowner, Rosemary Geibel, said some residents are worried about being able to walk in the plan.
Geibel said she had to jump off the street into greenery across from the plan's Club House social room near that intersection because a driver nearly hit her when she was walking her dog on July 21.
She also said that some people have been racing through the plan.
Geibel said she is pleased that the commissioners intend to approve the stop signs as part of an ordinance they consider in September.
“I was very thankful, very surprised and really had had no idea that they would act as quickly as they did,” Geibel said Tuesday morning.
Police Chief John Otto, who met with Geibel, said a curve on Trail Side contributes to making the intersection “tricky” for drivers and pedestrians.
Last week, police used a speed machine that lists the speed of each vehicle near the intersection.
The only stop sign at the intersection now is on Putter for drivers turning left or right onto Trail Side. Three driveways are near the intersection.
Chris Foreman is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 8671, or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.