Trafford officials consider revising B-Y Park rules
The popularity of the pavilions at B-Y Park is forcing Trafford officials to reconsider parking and rental rules to ensure safety and preserve the quality of the park.
Big crowds have shown up on multiple August weekends, and a large party with about 400 guests is scheduled for Sept. 14, borough officials said.
The increasing number of visitors is encouraging Trafford Council and Trafford Recreation Board members to suggest that the borough revise its pavilion-rental application for facilities at B-Y and Westmoreland parks to determine how many people will be appearing on certain days.
Any potential changes are too late for this year's rental season, but changes will be implemented for 2014, Councilwoman Vicki Megon said.
“It's never really been a problem until this upcoming event,” she said. “We've never really had anything that was too awfully big.”
Mayor Rey Peduzzi said officials are concerned about the ability of an emergency vehicle to drive into the park because of the unorganized parking arrangement on some occasions.
If someone from the borough isn't available to mark the roughly 75 spots in the upper lot, motorists sometimes park illegally along Route 130, he said.
Megon said police were issuing tickets last weekend to drivers who committed parking violations.
“We hope they keep up the good work,” rec board member Dominick Frollini said of the police.
Chris Foreman is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 8671, or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.