Democrats pick Schultz to run against Cardiff for 2-year Trafford seat
Trafford Democrats have chosen a sitting councilman to run against a political newcomer in a campaign for a two-year seat on council.
The Democrats' selection of Henry Schultz means he will appear twice on the Nov. 5 ballot — as Republican Kris Cardiff's opponent for the two-year seat and as one of five candidates seeking the four open four-year seats.
Schultz and Cardiff will square off to serve the final two years of a four-year term originally won by Frank Bruno, who resigned in February. Council appointed Jay Race — who is seeking a four-year term — to fill the seat through the end of the year.
Mary Dobos, a Trafford Democratic committeewoman, did not return messages requesting comment about the party's appointment. Schultz also did not return respond to requests for comment this story.
Cardiff, 36, is a 12-year borough resident who is the director of marketing and procurement for Quality Aviation Instruments Inc. in McKeesport. He considers himself a lifelong Trafford-area resident because he grew up in a section of North Huntingdon Township, near the Trafford Sportsmen's Club, that is close to the borough's border.
Among Cardiff's issues are improving the borough's communications with residents through its website and creating more pride in the town to encourage more people to be involved in the community.
He also wants to try to aid in the enticement of more businesses downtown, saying Trafford could be more like Irwin.
“We're on a main artery between the two counties, so why can't we bring in more businesses, too?” Cardiff said. “I think we can.”
Chris Foreman is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 8671, or email@example.com.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.