Penn-Trafford, union reach tentative deal to avoid outsourcing jobs
Paraprofessionals, custodians and secretaries in the Penn-Trafford School District would be protected from outsourcing proposals for three years under a tentative labor agreement that the school board will consider for approval next month.
As a concession, the 88 employees have agreed to a wage freeze in the second year of the new three-year deal. If the board approves the contract, the employees will receive raises of 30 cents per hour in the first and third years.
The school board has Oct. 7 and 14 meetings scheduled.
An official with the Service Employees International Union 32BJ said the biggest victory in the proposed contract is the preservation of the 38 paraprofessional positions, which the union says the district wanted to outsource to a private agency to save money.
Paraprofessionals — such as personal care assistants who work individually with special-education students, as well as classroom and instructional aides — perform specialized, teaching-related duties.
Sam Williamson, the union's assistant director, said Gov. Tom Corbett's “decimation of the public education budgets across the state” created the conditions for the tough negotiations that many school districts are having with their union employees.
“Our members recognize what the situation is, and they realize school districts are challenged and budgets are challenged and everybody's got to contribute to get through the next couple of years,” Williamson said.
Union officials went public last week with the employees' Sept. 5 approval of the contract terms. The status of the negotiations wasn't mentioned at the school board's Sept. 9 meeting.
Interim Superintendent Matt Harris said the resolution of the proposed outsourcing and the wage freeze were the main issues that led to the tentative agreement.
Before the school board passed its 2011-12 and 2012-13 budgets, it asked all of the district's bargaining units to accept a one-year wage freeze. None accepted.
“I'm glad it's actually going to the board for a vote because they do a lot for the school district,” Harris said of the proposed contract.
At a June school board meeting, some teachers, paraprofessionals and parents of special-needs children pleaded for board members not to choose outsourcing.
Many of the speakers said those students would be better served by locally hired aides.
“We're happy the contract is settled and these jobs will be kept in-house,” Cheryl McGartland, a paraprofessional at Sunrise Estates Elementary School, said in a prepared statement. “We live and work in this community and feel passionate about helping these children. We're glad we're staying.”
Under the proposed terms, secretaries and custodians will continue to receive health insurance through the district, but paraprofessionals will not, Williamson said.
Chris Foreman is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 8671, or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.