Penn-Trafford rec commission drops fee for grant services
The Penn-Trafford Area Recreation Commission no longer will charge its member communities an administrative fee for its director's grant-writing services.
With PTARC's fund balance up to $72,429 as of late September, board member Nick Petrucci recommended last week that the organization rescind the fee for municipalities seeking recreation grants. Petrucci said he originally supported the fee when PTARC had a “four-digit” general account balance but that the organization now could afford to eliminate the fee.
On Oct. 7, the board voted 5-1, with Larry Harrison casting the only vote against.
Though none of the PTARC-member municipalities ended up paying the fee, Petrucci said he thought the cost was a problem for small communities, like Trafford, where he also serves on the borough's recreation board. Trafford Council decided to have the borough manager complete the application for a $250,000 grant from the Commonwealth Financing Authority for a proposed Westmoreland Park improvement project.
PTARC board members previously passed a 5-percent administrative fee on grants funded by the state Department of Conservation and Natural Resources, or DCNR. In April, they added a 2.5-percent fee on successful grants from the state Department of Community and Economic Development, which administers the Commonwealth Financing Authority.
Board Chairman Randy Dreistadt said those involved in the creation of PTARC decided it was important to have a director with grant-writing skills to aid municipalities in getting funding for projects.
The fees were installed because there was a concern that too much time on grants would take away from her daily managing of recreation programs, he said.
Chris Foreman is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.