ShareThis Page

Sunoco to negotiate pipeline access in Bushy Run park

| Wednesday, Nov. 6, 2013, 4:30 p.m.

The Pennsylvania Historical and Museum Commission will be negotiating an agreement that will enable Sunoco Logistics to install a pipeline on a portion of the Bushy Run Battlefield state park in Penn Township, a commission spokesman said.

The proposed pipeline will be next to an existing pipeline owned by Dominion Transmission, spokesman Howard Pollman confirmed last week. Much of the pipeline's path in Westmoreland County is being planned to run near the rights of way established by the Dominion line.

The state commission is awaiting a written proposal from Sunoco, Pollman said.

“We've made contact, but we haven't heard back from them,” he said.

Westmoreland County court records show that Dominion officials agreed in 2011 to pay the commission $25,938 to install 1,408 feet of pipeline on two parcels. The state park encompasses more than 200 acres.

Bushy Run Battlefield Heritage Society president Bonnie Ramus and treasurer Kelly Ruoff said neither the existing line nor the proposed one is near the visitors center, the new monument that was dedicated during the 250th anniversary in August or other publicly visited areas at the park off Route 993.

“It won't disturb anything as far as where we do the tours or anything else,” Ramus said.

Chris Foreman is a staff writer for Trib Total Media.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.