ShareThis Page

Penn Township voters opt for Gwynn, Sullivan in commissioner races

| Tuesday, Nov. 5, 2013, 11:54 p.m.
Tim Gwynn
Tim Gwynn

Republicans will continue to hold all five Penn Township commissioner seats next year after voters last week favored the GOP candidate in two races.

Tim Gwynn claimed a big win over Marybeth Kuznik to represent the 4th Ward, while incumbent Commissioner Edward Sullivan appears to have won another close race over John Beech in the 2nd Ward, according to unofficial results reported last week by the Westmoreland County Election Bureau.

Beech, a former Democratic commissioner, essentially conceded in an interview last week. He said the 12-vote margin out of the 654 votes counted so far — less than 2 percentage points — is too wide to make up. County officials won't certify the results until they count any outstanding provisional, military or overseas absentee ballots in the race.

Sullivan, who is an engineer for a Pittsburgh firm, beat Beech two years ago by collecting 15 more votes among the 707 cast.

“The people in the 2nd Ward, as far as I'm concerned, are satisfied with Mr. Sullivan, and I wish him luck,” said Beech, 69, who was a commissioner from 1986 to 1992.

Beech attributed the loss to the failure by Democrats to go to the polls.

“It's just the way it is,” he said. “The Democrats don't come out.”

Sullivan, 51, said any Republican candidate running in the ward starts out with a disadvantage because its two precincts have a higher percentage of Democratic-registered voters than others in the township.

Appointed in December 2010, Sullivan will begin his first four-year term in January. Among the board's priorities will be hiring a new manager to replace the retiring Bruce Light, he said.

Sullivan said he doesn't expect the board to be planning any “drastic” changes.

“I think it's a very livable community, and I think we certainly want to keep it that way,” Sullivan said. “I just want to make sure, from my standpoint, that we're really being fiscally responsible.”

Gwynn took 68 percent of the vote in his race against Kuznik, a state Democratic committeewoman and local election judge.

Gwynn, 47, said he expects to be doing a lot of listening in his early months on the board because he hasn't had previous experience in township government. He has described himself as having conservative values but said he plans to have an open mind on issues. “My mind is going to go in, ‘Let's make the best decision for Penn Township,'” Gwynn said. “There's no Republican agenda. There's no Republican agenda.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.