Proposed Manor budget would hold line on tax rate
By Chris Foreman
Published: Wednesday, Nov. 13, 2013, 9:00 p.m.
Manor Council's budget estimates for 2014 won't require property owners to face a higher tax rate in the spring.
Council is advertising a budget that would keep the property-tax rate at 16.5 mills.
Final approval of the estimated $1.1 million in expenses is expected to happen at council's Dec. 18 meeting.
Officials anticipate carrying over a nearly $290,000 surplus in the general fund from this year, borough manager Joe Lapia said.
One year after council budgeted for hiring a third full-time officer, council members scrapped a plan to add another full-timer to the force in 2014.
“While a fourth full-time officer would be great … we cannot figure it in and make the numbers work,” Council President Dawn Lynn said.
Council also decided against reserving $17,500 to upgrade the marquee on Route 993 that advertises community events.
Officials are planning to budget $140,000 for street paving next year.
They also have about $14,000 in drilling-impact fees that they might use for road improvements or other infrastructure projects.
Many other budget line items are similar to this year's spending levels.
Chris Foreman is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 8671, or email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Longtime administrator fired by Trafford Council
- Level Green man faces child pornography charges
- Hempfield court loss could save PTARC cash