Trafford seeks grant, loan to upgrade sewage system
Trafford officials are seeking financing help from the state for an estimated $5.5 million project to upgrade its sewage infrastructure.
The borough's application to the Pennsylvania Infrastructure and Investment Authority, or PENNVEST, was submitted in mid-November, borough engineer Don Glenn said.
The authority might consider whether it will award any funding as soon whether as its next meeting, which is scheduled for Jan. 21.
Depending on a variety of economic conditions, the authority could offer Trafford a low-interest loan, a grant or both to help cover the cost of the project, for which council might solicit bids in early 2014.
Glenn said he wants to take advantage of the off-season for most contractors by requesting the contract bids during the winter.
“When we come into spring, we'll have our prices locked in (because) we sure as heck don't want to come advertising in June and July, when the contractors are busy,” Glenn said.
Trafford is planning work to replace century-old terra cotta sewage lines because of a mandate from the state Department of Environmental Protection that dates back to 2004.
The worst sections of the system are projected to cost about $530,000 to replace, but officials decided to replace other aging lines throughout the borough.
Nearby Manor is using a $1.6 million loan through PENNVEST to cover most of the cost of sewage improvements, including the state-mandated replacement of combined sanitary and storm-water lines.
Trafford Council recently voted to increase the quarterly sewage rate, mostly to pass on a fee increase by the Allegheny County Sanitary Authority.
However, council members did not increase the maintenance portion of a ratepayer's bill.
Chris Foreman is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 8671, or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.