Board interviews candidates to lead Penn Area Library
Finalists for the open director position at Penn Area Library will be invited to meet with the library board's personnel committee in the coming weeks, board president Joseph Burns said.
Library officials are searching for a successor to Christine Miller, who moved to California after serving as director since early 2010. Pat Cappeta, coordinator of the library's children's section, is serving as interim director.
Board members have had phone interviews with some of the nearly 20 people who applied for the job, Burns said. He declined to say how many have been chosen to meet with board members.
Burns said the committee's goal was to get “as wide a collection as possible” of people who already have been directors or have been working toward that goal, though the first consideration likely will be a candidate's supervisory skills.
The library employs four full-time employees and about half a dozen part-time employees, and volunteers perform some tasks.
Library officials said they expect that Cappeta will continue fill in into February as the personnel committee whittles the field to a recommendation to the full board, Burns said.
Candidates are from inside and outside of the Pittsburgh region. The library director is not required to live in Penn Township, he said.
Chris Foreman is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-856-7400, ext. 8671, or firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.